The constitutionality of the statutes was called into question. 388 U.S. 1, 87 S. Ct. 1817, 18 L. Ed. The film, about an interracial couple planning to marry, became a box-office hit in 1967, the same year as the Supreme Court decision in Loving v. Virginia. Posted on November 9, 2012 | Constitutional Law | Tags: Constitutional Law Case Brief.

Loving v. Virginia. In 1958, Virginia residents Richard and Mildred Loving married in Washington, D.C., and returned home to Virginia where they were arrested and subsequently pled guilty to violating the law. Loving is a 2016 American biographical romantic drama film which tells the story of Richard and Mildred Loving, the plaintiffs in the 1967 U.S. Supreme Court (the Warren Court) decision Loving v. Virginia, which invalidated state laws prohibiting interracial marriage. The state of Virginia enacted laws making it a felony for a white person to intermarry with a black person or the reverse. The film was produced by Big Beach and Raindog Films, and distributed by Focus Features. Facts . Loving v. Virginia Summary. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Loving v.Virginia (No. In this book, we learn about Richard & Mildred Loving, the couple behind this infamous case. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of an interracial couple who married in D.C. and whose marriage was invalidated when they returned to their home state of Virginia. Anti-miscegenation laws prohibit the marrying of different races with another. Citation. 395) In Loving v Virginia a married couple from Washington D.C. moved to Virginia where they were then subject to Virginia’s anti-miscegenation statute. Told in verse, Loving Vs. Virginia is very much the love story of Richard Loving, a white man, and Mildred, a biracial woman. The two had gone to another state to obtain a marriage license and returned to their home state of Virginia afterward. In Virginia, this statute prohibited the marriage between whites and any other race.Richard Loving, a white man, and Mildred … Loving v. Virginia. Loving Vs. Virginia is the Supreme Court case that legalized marriage between races. Virginia. Plaintiffs were charged with and convicted of inter-racial marriage. Later on they were confronted by police at their home. Brief Fact Summary. The Court decided that Virginia laws which prohibited interracial marriage were unconstitutional as violations of the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
2d 1010, 1967 U.S. 1082.